Is Your AI Spend Buying Progress or Delay?
Someone posted on Reddit recently, r/smallbusiness, if you want to go look, about their side project. Software business. They were spending $200 a month on ads, $50 on AI tools, and a few extra dollars on a scraper. Revenue: $49 in total.
The commenters were blunt. You’re spending more on the tools than you’re making from the business.
The owner wasn’t wrong about AI. They weren’t wrong about ads. They were wrong about the order. They built a cost structure before they had a revenue structure, and the AI subscriptions were the most visible symptom.
This pattern is everywhere in Australian small business right now, and it’s worth naming it properly.
AI spend is COGS. Treat it that way.
If you run your books through Xero or MYOB, you already understand cost of goods sold. COGS is what it costs to produce what you sell. It scales with revenue, or it should.
AI subscriptions don’t feel like COGS. They feel like software, like overheads, like “the cost of doing business in 2026.” That framing is exactly what gets small businesses into trouble.
A ChatGPT Pro subscription, a Jasper licence, a Zapier plan, an AI SEO tool, a meeting summariser, stack them together and you’re at $200–$400 a month before you’ve made anything. If your revenue is zero, or $49, those aren’t productivity tools. They’re a bet you’re making on a future that hasn’t arrived yet.
Treat AI spend the same way your accountant treats any other business expense: does it directly support the revenue you’re generating right now? If you can’t draw a straight line from the subscription to a dollar earned or an hour saved, that subscription is overhead on a business that doesn’t exist yet.
The vanity stack problem
There’s a specific kind of AI spend that feels productive but isn’t. Call it the vanity stack.
You sign up for a tool because it sounds useful. It generates content, or automates follow-ups, or summarises your inbox. You spend a weekend setting it up. You feel like you’ve done something. You haven’t made a sale, but you’ve made progress, haven’t you?
No. You’ve made a system for a business that doesn’t have customers yet. The system isn’t the business.
Australia has 2.7 million small businesses. According to the ABS, 97.3% of all businesses in this country are small businesses. The ones that survive aren’t the ones with the most sophisticated tool stacks. They’re the ones that got paying customers first and automated second.
Every dollar you spend on AI tooling before your first ten paying customers is a dollar you’re borrowing from future Frank, or future Sarah, or future whoever, who has to make up that ground before the business is genuinely viable.
A simple test for every AI subscription
Before your next credit card statement arrives, run every AI tool through this audit. Five questions. Honest answers only.
- Is this saving me measurable time? Not “I think it might be”, measurable. An hour a week minimum. If you can’t name the hours, the tool isn’t working for you.
- Is this directly generating revenue? Writing copy that converts, qualifying leads, automating invoices. If the connection is vague (“it helps me think”), that’s not revenue generation.
- Would I pay for this with cash from a customer? If the only money in the account is your own savings or a loan, and you’d hesitate to spend real money on this, cancel it.
- Am I actually using it? Login history doesn’t lie. Gut feeling does. Check the last login date. If it’s more than three weeks ago, you’ve already answered the question.
- Can I defend this to my accountant? Not explain it, defend it. “It felt like it would help” is not a defence. “It saves four hours a week on STP reconciliation” is.
That last question is the one most people skip. Your accountant is the closest thing a small business has to a cold-eyed external reviewer. If you’d be embarrassed to justify the spend out loud, that’s information.
What the cap should be
Until you have ten paying customers, or whatever the equivalent milestone is in your business, keep your AI tool spend under $50 a month. One tool. Maybe two.
Pick the one that does the most for the least. For most AU service businesses, that’s a generative AI tool for drafting (ChatGPT, Claude, whatever your preference). Everything else is optional until the revenue covers it.
Once you hit ten customers, you can start thinking about Zapier automations, AI scheduling tools, CRM integrations. At that point you have real revenue, real workflow bottlenecks, and real reason to automate. You’re not building a system for a hypothetical business anymore, you’re scaling an actual one.
The Reddit poster wasn’t dumb. They were ahead of themselves. They built the infrastructure before the foundation was there. That’s a fixable mistake, but only if you catch it.
The only AI spend that counts
There’s one standard worth applying to every line item on your AI subscriptions bill: would you defend this spend to your accountant?
Not to yourself, and not to the LinkedIn post that told you AI would transform your business. To someone who looks at your P&L and asks where the money went.
If the answer is yes, if you can say “this tool saved me eight hours last month, which at my hourly rate is worth $640, against a cost of $49”, keep it. That’s a real business decision.
If the answer is “I’m still figuring out how to use it”, that’s not a business expense. That’s a hobby subscription. Cancel it, come back when you have customers, and sign up again when you know exactly what problem you’re solving.
A tool that sits in the drawer doesn’t build anything.
📖 More deep dives: News Deep Dives
📊 Compare AI tools side by side | 💼 Free resources & AI prompt packs
More hot takes: Hot Takes →
If this interests you
- OpenAI Said Sorry. Here’s What That Actually Means for Australian Businesses.
- Bill Gates Said AI Could Kill a Billion People. Here’s What That Means for Australian Small Business
- OpenAI Is Killing Custom GPTs. Here’s Your Exit Checklist
More hot takes: Hot Takes →
